You
know you need auto insurance before you can operate any kind of
motor vehicle - not just because it's the law, but because you also
want to protect yourself financially.
By purchasing auto insurance, you're not just protecting yourself
against the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle if it is
damaged or stolen. You're also protecting your financial future.
If you are involved in an accident that causes serious injury to
someone else, the courts could order you to pay a substantial amount
of money in damages. That's why every auto insurance policy includes
protection against Third Party Liability.
You must have a minimum of $200,000 in Third Party Liability coverage.
This is to cover injuries to any other person, or their property,
when you're the at-fault driver in an accident.
But If you are involved in a serious automobile accident, $200,000
will not go very far to cover the damages. It's common to have $1,000,000
or more of liability coverage. Remember- you're responsible for
any shortfall in coverage.
It's not required by
law to purchase automobile insurance to cover damages to your automobile.
But if you have a newer automobile, you'll want to protect your
financial investment and consider purchasing collision and/or comprehensive
coverage.
If you're leasing or financing your automobile,
the leasing company or bank will require that you insure your automobile
for collision and comprehensive coverage. They will not release
the funds to purchase the automobile until you commit to that coverage.
When you make a claim, a small
portion of the claim is always paid by you first, then your insurance
company pays the rest. The portion you pay is called your deductible.
The amount of your deductible affects the price of your insurance
policy. The higher your deductible, the less the cost of your insurance
premium.
To reduce your auto insurance
premium, you may want to consider increasing your deductible. Be
sure to select a deductible that you are comfortable with. For example,
if you choose a deductible of $1,000, you need to know that you
would be able to pay it without too much difficulty if your vehicle
is involved in an accident.
|
|
Sale
This website
is for sale, ask
for details or visit website sales!
The best North American financial institutions is a top list of US finance service providers and free online catalogue. Comprehensive internet banking information guide.
The biggest USA & Canada cities of bank operations.
New York City, NY
Los Angeles, California
Chicago, Illinois
Houston, Texas
Phoenix, Arizona
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
San Antonio, Texas
San Diego, California
Dallas, Texas
San Jose, California
Toronto, Ontario
Montreal, Quebec
Vancouver, British Columbia
Calgary, Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Ottawa - Gatineau, Ontario/Quebec
Quebec City, Quebec
Hamilton, Ontario
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Detroit, Michigan
possible keywords strings:
Insurance quotes best car health travel home etc. Car insurance, Online auto insurance quote auto insurance quote, auto insurance company, car insurance rate, online car insurance, cheapest car insurance, free car insurance quote, rental car insurance, progressive car insurance, classic car insurance Car insurance, health insurance, home insurance, travel insurance, home insurance, life insurance, auto cheap insurance, home owner insurance, Auto insurance quote, medical dental insurance, recreation vehicle insurance, insurance company, term life insurance, business insurance broker renter insurance, rates insurance long-term care, insurance tools, calculators, variable annuity, term insurance
Recommended for reading
US and global financial ratings and reviews information.
Read the rest of the book at Questia online library.
Efficient Monopolies: The Limits of Competition in the European Property Insurance Market
Book by Oxford University Press, 2004
Preface
This book studies the market for property insurance in five countries, Britain, Spain, France, Switzerland, and Germany. It argues that in this market state monopolies outperform competitive markets, both in the provision of insurance against standard risks such as fire and in the provision of insurance against 'uninsurable' risks such as floods or subsidence. We hope that our empirical findings will stimulate economists to think more deeply about the relative merits of state provision and competitive markets.
The main driving forces underlying our results can be briefly summarised. First, competitive insurers typically work with high sales and administrative costs, as a result of which claims payments make up only about 50 per cent of premium income. State monopolies can work with considerably lower 'load factors', thus allowing substantial costs savings to the customers.
Best American Banks Ratings Online Banking US Bank Reviews
Second, risk selection plays an important role on the market for property insurance. Private insurers try to avoid selling insurance to the bad risks and/or substantially reduce the cover for customers who at some point in time turn out to be bad risks. The non-availability of adequate insurance against risks where the owners stand to lose most of their worldly possessions results in substantial welfare losses. For state monopolies, risk selection is not an issue, and they provide better insurance even to the bad risks. Third, in property insurance, the best way to keep claims low is to invest into adequate preventive activities. These often take the form of local public goods (land zoning, firefighting, and so on). When insurance is provided by a state monopoly, it is possible to integrate prevention and insurance. The data for Switzerland clearly show that this integration leads to substantial increases in resources devoted to preventive activities and corresponding reductions in claims. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the many individuals who patiently explained to me the institutional specificities of the markets they work in, and provided me with the necessary data. My special thanks go to Martin Kamber of the IRV in Bern, without whose patient help and encouragement this book would most probably never have been completed. Any remaining errors are, of course, solely my own responsibility.
Introduction
The final two decades of the twentieth century saw a wave of privatisations. Many governments in the industrial world withdrew either partially or completely from large sectors of the economy. Well-known examples are telecommunications, railways, air traffic, electricity, and water, which were all liberalised. A number of factors gave rise to this development. Technological changes meant that sectors which previously had all the hallmarks of a natural monopoly could be opened up to competition. Market liberalisation was an opportunity to curb the power of the trade unions. Politicians began to realise that competitive markets provide a number of benefits to consumers, including:
• the private sector's innovative drive;
• the product differentiation that results from private firms' efforts to distinguish themselves from their competitors, and adaptation of their services to consumer demands; and
• the more rigorous cost control of private (profit-maximising) firms.
Furthermore, economic freedom is an important feature of any free society, and powerful arguments are required to justify curtailing freedom of contract.